We investigate the ability of Vision Language Models (VLMs) to perform visual perspective taking using a novel set of visual tasks inspired by established human tests. Our approach leverages carefully controlled scenes, in which a single humanoid minifigure is paired with a single object. By systematically varying spatial configurations - such as object position relative to the humanoid minifigure and the humanoid minifigure's orientation - and using both bird's-eye and surface-level views, we created 144 unique visual tasks. Each visual task is paired with a series of 7 diagnostic questions designed to assess three levels of visual cognition: scene understanding, spatial reasoning, and visual perspective taking. Our evaluation of several state-of-the-art models, including GPT-4-Turbo, GPT-4o, Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-Instruct, and variants of Claude Sonnet, reveals that while they excel in scene understanding, the performance declines significantly on spatial reasoning and further deteriorates on perspective-taking. Our analysis suggests a gap between surface-level object recognition and the deeper spatial and perspective reasoning required for complex visual tasks, pointing to the need for integrating explicit geometric representations and tailored training protocols in future VLM development.

Graph representation plays an important role in the field of financial risk control, where the relationship among users can be constructed in a graph manner. In practical scenarios, the relationships between nodes in risk control tasks are bidirectional, e.g., merchants having both revenue and expense behaviors. Graph neural networks designed for undirected graphs usually aggregate discriminative node or edge representations with an attention strategy, but cannot fully exploit the out-degree information when used for the tasks built on directed graph, which leads to the problem of a directional bias. To tackle this problem, we propose a Directed Graph ATtention network called DGAT, which explicitly takes out-degree into attention calculation. In addition to having directional requirements, the same node might have different representations of its input and output, and thus we further propose a dual embedding of DGAT, referred to as DEDGAT. Specifically, DEDGAT assigns in-degree and out-degree representations to each node and uses these two embeddings to calculate the attention weights of in-degree and out-degree nodes, respectively. Experiments performed on the benchmark datasets show that DGAT and DEDGAT obtain better classification performance compared to undirected GAT. Also,the visualization results demonstrate that our methods can fully use both in-degree and out-degree information.

The Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) is a popular optimization algorithm that has a wide range of applications, including generalized linear model in statistics and deep Neural Network in machine learning. One main advantage of the SGD is the computational scalability due to low cost per iteration. Recent work also indicates that the SGD might also lead to outcomes that possess nice statistical properties under the linear regression framework, see [19]. In this paper, we study the statistical properties of the SGD under nonparametric regression models. We focus on the Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space (RKHS) model, which is popular in both statistics and machine learning communities and is often simply referred to as the "kernel trick," see [2, 27].

Understanding the algorithmic regularization effect of stochastic gradient descent (SGD) is one of the key challenges in modern machine learning and deep learning theory. Most of the existing works, however, focus on very small or even infinitesimal learning rate regime, and fail to cover practical scenarios where the learning rate is moderate and annealing. In this paper, we make an initial attempt to characterize the particular regularization effect of SGD in the moderate learning rate regime by studying its behavior for optimizing an overparameterized linear regression problem. In this case, SGD and GD are known to converge to the unique minimum-norm solution; however, with the moderate and annealing learning rate, we show that they exhibit different directional bias: SGD converges along the large eigenvalue directions of the data matrix, while GD goes after the small eigenvalue directions. Furthermore, we show that such directional bias does matter when early stopping is adopted, where the SGD output is nearly optimal but the GD output is suboptimal. Finally, our theory explains several folk arts in practice used for SGD hyperparameter tuning, such as (1) linearly scaling the initial learning rate with batch size; and (2) overrunning SGD with high learning rate even when the loss stops decreasing.

For this setup we need adjusted data for all Dow-30 stocks since 01/2000. The DLPAL p-indicator workspace setup is shown below. We have applied a profit target and stop-loss of 2% because we are interested in short-term directional price action. We also marked "Show All results" because we then would like to calculate the P-Dow indicator value. The longer-term trend is removed from the results by checking "Detrend All results.